0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏ µµ½ÃÁö¿ª ³²ÀÚ°í±³»ýµéÀÇ ¿äÅë°æÇè°ú ¹ß»ý¿äÀο¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A Study on the Experience of Back Pain and Developmental Factors of Male High School Students in an Urban area

Çѱ¹Çб³º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 1999³â 12±Ç 2È£ p.321 ~ 337
KMID : 0608419990120020321
Á¤½ÂÈñ ( Chung Seung-Hee ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Á¶¿µ½Å ( Cho Young-Shin ) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain basic data for the prevention and control of adolescent back pain through analyzing connections between study environments and physical posture. The subjects were 960 male general high school students in the Chonju area and the data were collected by a self-reported questionaire from Mar.17 to Mar.22, 1999. The collected data were analyzed by a frequency, chi-square and t-test using an SPSS program. The results are as follows;1) The experience rate of back pain perceived by subjects was 67.5% and by each grade: 1st-27.5%, 2nd-35.4%,3rd-37.1%. The relationship between grades and the experience of back pain didn¡¯t show any significant difference. 2) The causes of back pain perceived by subjects such as postures are not good was 56.7%,sitting too much time in a chair was 39.1%, and too severe exercise was 32.4%.27.8% had back pain first during the 3rd grade of middle school, and 23.9% had it first during the 1st grade of high school. 3) Intensity of subjects¡¯ back pain spread from moderate at 49.6%, to severe at 16.4%. Cocerning the frequency of back pain, 58.6% said it was irregalar. 4) Among interventions to deal with back pain: move by exercising my back or ask friends to beat my back was 41.0%,just bear it¡¯ was 23.1%m and at home ¡¯don¡¯t have ¡¯any treatment¡¯ was ranked first, at 54.9%. 5) The relationship between subjects¡¯ general characteristics and back pain experiences :height(t=-1.99,P=.046), sitting/height(t=-2.61,P=.009), self-perceived condition of health(x2=23.530,P=.000),family history(x2=43.903,P=.000) showed significant difference, but the kinds of transportation, sleeping postures, sleeping method and smoking didn¡¯t show significant differences. 6) The relationship between subjects¡¯ learning environment and back pain experiences, the height of students¡¯ desk and chair showed significant difference(x2=23.054,P=.000),but the sitting time didn¡¯t show significant difference. 7) The relationship between the characteristics of subjects¡¯ physical postures and back pain experiences: standing postures(x2=15.105,P=.001), and sitting postures (x2=20.264,P=.001) showed significant difference, but lifting postures didn¡¯t show significant difference.
KeyWords

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)